Eugene, I think that no one here wants to hurt Vladimir foliage. It is possible that it draws not only for the benefit and enjoyment of and enthusiasm. His "metaphor" sometimes witty, sometimes funny.
But the main thing, what he is, he says, aims - to transmit "a sense of mystery, of something unusual and mysterious - he can not be reached.
Of course, he tries to intrigue the viewer, to engage him in the game.
But it seems that he and grateful for his viewers do not realize that in art for centuries is far more exciting and gambling.
This remark was made on the merits:
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от nikola
Who dare to be interesting, black and white, to present a formula of fine art. I think this is the theme can be very long, possibly infinite. (About art and about art, may speak only the language of art.)
|
Well said. Another add "no accounting for tastes, and you can close the forum
.
Читать дальше...
But the art is really no more interesting task than finding the formula of Art. In this it resembles alchemy, where the search prescription get gold from lead masked the internal process of the transfiguration of the worshiper. Like the alchemists used to say, "Our gold is not gold crowd.
However, finding a formula equivalent to the art of death art.
So on isskusstve, like God, it's safe to say apophatic in adverse determinations - ie that is not art. Intuitively, we feel it and trying to define art by identifying non-artistic phenomena.
Hence, strictly speaking, there is a question of taste as a developed ability to distinguish between non-art.
Well, anything goes at the same time the art does not conspire against the artists, like foliage, and placing them galeristkam, ironically acting in the role of arbiters of high taste.