Цитата:
Сообщение от Pluh
Sorry, but you confuse the concept. Borrowing and fake. Is existing paintings executed by Picasso, but signed, such as Renoir, Dufy, or Gauguin, Rembrandt and Botticelli, and so on. Borrowing from the great artist, a very small part of the creative process. That if you want the knowledge and recognition of another master artist. And for that he bears full responsibility putting his signature on the product. Falsifiers, in most cases, still concerned about the commercial component and may in some cases increase their self-esteem - and so I can not. But this is deceptive triumph. After all, stolen everything - plot, technique, vision and chuvstvoa master and finally his name. He did not master, he is simply a coward, afraid to put their creativity to the audience, of course, if such he holds.
|
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Quote:
Message from Pluh
Sorry, but you confuse the concept. Borrowing and fake.
DEAR Pluh,
I am interested in the difference vmotivah, not in terms
Quote:
Message from Pluh
Falsifiers, in most cases, still concerned about the commercial component and may in some cases increase their self-esteem - and I so I
Oh yes, and Picasso with Hearst concerned than were?
Added after 5 minutes
Message from Tiutchev
This is not a fake.
-------------------------
Well, yes that's right, your name must be manipulated ...
But nature still the same ... (face it no .. where one ends and another begins?)
Well, yes, and "money does not smell" and "winners are not judged" ...