Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 29.08.2010, 20:44 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Гуру
 
Аватар для SergeiSK
 
Регистрация: 10.08.2008
Адрес: Russia, $ochi
Сообщений: 5,666
Спасибо: 1,397
Поблагодарили 6,209 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 9995
По умолчанию

I have this article artist Vladimir Salnikov liked. A sober and objective view. Especially on these things:
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
CONTEMPORARY ART, contemporary art - contemporary art is not us, it is not art, which makes contemporaries. This specific cultural invention, which declared itself the vanguard of an heir.
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
Russia did not participate in the Reformation nor Counter-Reformation, so the Russian artist paints constantly out of place - put in a still life Budyonnovka cap, then sandals.
Exactly! And Mickey Mouse icon puts too.
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
But there are liberal idiots who are struggling with the church - perhaps because they think: believers sure to substitute the left cheek, in fact, they quarreled and contemporary art and society.
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
Stalin became a symbol of Russia. In the project "Name of Russia", he won his slowed down due to administrative resources. You can not protest against the views of the whole nation. Moreover, the sovereign power - the people of Russia. How can you consider yourself a democrat and deny the majority opinion?
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
original phenomena were the Moscow Conceptual Art, "Sots" art and Actionism nineties. The last decade - the emptiness, the solid degradation.
And like the answer Salnikava critics of his article. This, incidentally, and here there are:
"You've lived in the backwoods, judging by your statements, primarily in the domestic, domestic backwater."



SergeiSK вне форума   Ответить с цитированием