Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
Engraving, which bring you dated, and engravings, which led me dated (1830-1835 year).
Preservation, quality of prints and rare color combinations, can all play a role in the formation of prices. But in this case clearly established that the imprint of the first edition and it is so significantly affected the price.
|
No, it's not dating, but amusing ... Hokusai was working on this series from 1826 to 1830, and somewhere at the turn of 1830 and 1831 it was published. If there was a belief that the engraving of the very first edition, you should put the 1830-1831 and 1835 - is the devil knows what kind of impression on the account. Sold at Christie's engraving can also be confidently dated to 1830-1835, but this dating is not much point.
I think the buyer with the help of its experts was able to establish that he sold at Sotheby's imprint is one of the first, why pay so much money. Not because Sotheby's has put the approximate spread of dates.
In general, for the rest, I agree, can not even see what else to argue
