[Pavel]

Сообщение от Peter

Well, I do not see contradictions ... The higher professional skill, the more opportunities for the artist to express his artistic vision, if only he would byl.Eto wide smysle.Etot idea is not necessarily literary narrative, for the artist is a composite, plastic, coloristic, but God knows the end result kakoy.Vazhen-generated imagery, which we did not leave ravnodushnym.Vozmem the same "square" Malevicha.Dur the long run (where is the value of each line, and plastic klor , tone and color?) And art image turned out! "Otherwise it would not be so worried about so many lyudey.A Katya Medvedev? Nonsense or artist?-artist! A Pirosmani?-artist! artist is a way of thinking and way of thinking so! Each year, tens of thin . schools produce artists by profession, artists become unity! And with Shishkin, Dunayevsky, Mikhalkov will not do anything, they are also an artist and it is quite dokazali.Naschet Jackie Chan does not know, but in a personal duel doubt ... he convinced me to .<!--~ a ~-->.

What exactly did Medvedev, except that its all they know? You compare it with Pirismani? But Pirosmani artist and it shows in the works, the artist with his glance of. Medvedev is simply a fan, without any merit. If you can prove otherwise, can be illustrated by examples.