Here the situation is like in football. Judge credited the disputed goal - even videopovtor it would not cancel. Counted judge these works unreal, so Mr. Azadovsky must take it for granted, or go to other expert organizations and try to oprovernut view the Russian Museum. What will be the most loyal in this situation.
I personally handed over for examination a few works by famous artists with the same "perfect" Provenance. Starting from the high-profile names in which these works were, finishing confirmation relatives. The experts recognized the work of forgeries. So Azadovsky not alone in his disappointment. But if he wants to refute, then let him hold another examination. Not only was it a refutation of cases Appraisal? Another personal example - my work of the artist Leonard Tourjansky GosNIIR considered forgery and issuing a written negative conclusion. Do not believe it, and gave a Grabar. And received positive confirmation of authorship. And the whole process in these two institutions was absolutely clean, without a bribe.
|