[Eriksson]

I do not see anything criminal or suspicious to answer the auction.
It is a legitimate interest in only one - why they were "denied access to the picture? Oh is not there a double or even triple play?
Inflate this matter is not in the interests of Christie `s. Consequently, his "selfish" interest in pursuing the plaintiff.
And the fact that Christie `s rejected expertise Petrova - this is natural. After all the scandals, his reputation in the West strongly raised questions, to put it mildly.

Incidentally, the material in Kommersant much sin that demonstrates the opinion of only one side of the process. Bad journalistic tone. Previously, this newspaper does not allow this.

"Especially in recent years, Christie` s persistently trying to establish supremacy in Russia and former Soviet republics in connection with the rapid development of Russian art market. "

But whether the plans of Mr. Vakselberga to pull the plug western auction houses and to establish their own home? Denigrate competitors and other people's bones to build their empire? Why? With Skolkovo not work out, so why not trample down the art market? Close to the Kremlin, as one of the collectors, organizational abilities are present, and the other competitors do not see - well, not counting the same "Gelos" for a competitor?