Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 23.07.2010, 17:41 Язык оригинала: Русский       #64
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,122
Спасибо: 6,224
Поблагодарили 6,565 раз(а) в 3,055 сообщениях
Репутация: 12917
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw Посмотреть сообщение
Eugene expressed his private opinion estimate. Do you write about certain investments (for you is a financial mechanism or what?).

Can not tell the investment of crazy shopping. And that picture of that kind of money in particular.
In my words on investments was sarcasm, sorry that you did not see it.
I just like Eugene, to express his personal opinion in this case of of certain investments . As can be seen (veryatnee all assume) from the title of plenipotentiary of Vekselberg Aurora Fine Arts Investments, the reason was a desire to purchase invest, rather than any aesthetic predilections, Mr. Vekselberg.
Rights must be matched by the capacity to protect these rights, with this, I hope you will not argue. This is about such people even .
serious collectors the scandal may not be deterred, but unless serious invested in art?
Hence, the question was: Are you with me diskutiruete?



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием