Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
And yet, who is aware of that specifically identified it is a fake, chemistry, X-rays (one word technological expertise), or all together?
|
"It is quite well done, this forgery. When I saw it in the catalog Christie's, even paid no attention - Kustodiev and Kustodiev", - said the expert.
He noted that in a simple visual inspection to determine the forgery was impossible. "Only when we started to look under the microscope on the level of texture and rhythm, nerve thing, something unexpected happened," - said Petrov.
In the conclusion, which it is issued at the picture in 2006, said: "Given the obvious overall similarity between songs ... the picture of the spatial characteristics and color of building, texture (rhythm and kinetics) swabs differ from standard, revealing more primitive, devoid of artistry kustodievskogo character .
He said further work was only confirmed the initial guess, which was unpleasantly surprised and expert, and owner of the painting.
"Then there was a reconciliation with the famous and picturesque drawings Kustodieva things, and it seemed a good compilation, when all the details of the drawings and paintings are composed of, but clean and beautiful jewels, when you look at the rhythm, as laid, such as shoes, rugs, this work has already No "- said the expert.
"For instance, you take two landscapes Polenov, overlays on each other and a new Polenov 'with typical features," - explained the meaning Petrov compilation of painting.
"The timing of" Naked in the interior "It is difficult, but it is not fresh things - about 1920-1950-s", - the expert said. Petrov suggests that the picture could be created by emigrants who left Russia after the Revolution of 1917. "As far as I know, just after the Civil War, in exile, doing such things," - he said. According to him, several years ago in the storerooms of museums in Prague he was shown things of this kind.
For information about the painting "Nude in the interior" appeared in the 5 th volume published Rosokhrankultura directory "Warning: may be fake!". Apart from the image into the directory have included information about the picture - in particular, the editors reminded that the painting had sold at Christie's in 1989 and then also appeared in directories under the authorship of Kustodiev. Then any questions about the authenticity arose. as Kustodiev. Then no claims to its authenticity arose. The publication featured and expert advice on pattern made Petrov, Russian Scientific Centre of restoration. Grabar and the Russian Museum - all of them deny authorship Kustodieva.-o-
http://russian.people.com.cn/31520/7073037.html