Цитата:
Сообщение от Peter
Why are modern, new, etc. art should be associated only with some trash, decay and immorality. (otherwise not modern?)
|
Because it is now fashionable, cool ... And even an adult uncle, all his life selling third-rate socialist realism and ustakanivshiysya on the principles and ideals, it also dramatically alters the orientation and he begins to "like" Forbidden Art ". Due to the fact that it did not consider it backward.
Journalist Glance
Maxim Sokolov even before the start of the process:
"The verdict would have been, of course, disliked by placing two elderly men in detention because they played badly and they had neither the intellect nor the heart to the simplest" I'm sorry, not very well work out. More will not. What once would have removed all the questions and would guarantee an excuse,
but it is true, it would be a terrible blow for colleagues in their genre and the genre in general. After all, the meaning of the latter lies in the fact that the modern artist in his experiments by definition can not play too long. In contrast, the steeper and sadche - the better ».
Andrew Archangel, the cultural editor of the journal Ogonyok:
"Granted, our society is already far enough advanced in terms of understanding: it is already, for example, knows that
« artist deliberately provoked, "or that" the artist can barking dog, and that's fine. And while in the shower most of the view that "so everyone can draw, but this was not aloud to say,
feel that this" backward glance ", and prefer looking at the next abstraction oil on calico, to admit that "something in that is. What a horrible way such art is considered "cool" - so to hell with it, we are ready to admit that we, too, was cool.
That is, in fact, our society is not so bad, except for one point: one for himself can not explain convincingly to prove what good is it art community? And especially why "offending, why bash on" holy "? For what purpose? What's the point? "