eva777, let's order. You do not think provenance an important pillar of attribution?? If we were talking about a small graphic image or theater costume Exter, then yes, not all of these things can be traced. But we are talking about great! oil, seized from nowhere.
As for the great work on the definition of authorship: if you carefully read the description, there is a symbiosis istroricheskoy help with the biography of the artist itself. Under this you can write anything. And quite admit that the man was sincerely believe in this work, when I wrote the conclusion. Compositional component allotted only one paragraph, written in general terms "The compositional plane is very well developed: fine gradations of green and grey, multiple hues of blue and a spectrum of brown tones co-exist. The image is constructed by the intricate interplay of streams of light, transparent contours, multiplying silhouettes and superimposed strata, all of which import a lithe, dramatic quality to the painting, a sense of unpredictability and uncertainty ".
This work is very similar, as I said, the other works that were even at one time declared false and knowledgeable market participants, I think, will understand what I mean. And do these things the hand of one man.
In the photo is difficult to judge, but people who saw it live, was told that she looks weak.
I can not say anything, but all these factors I have cited above, cause personally I have serious doubts about its authenticity.
__________________
До меня мир рисовали таким, как его видят. Я рисую так, как его мыслю. (с) Пикассо.
|