Цитата:
Сообщение от Tana
Altim, thank you so much for the review, it is surprising that Lomykin sold Lot 115, somehow I can not say 100%that it was he, some inner sense ... not sold Malyshev, Spring (!) and Glushchenko (in any form), perhaps the price of spring and Glushchenko were "extremely high ".... well Aivazovsky, is probably" Ukrainian "weakness (och.somnevayus that this is the most Aivazovsky )...
|
Please :-)
115 th lot - dubious, in my personal opinion. I do these rough chopped pastels get around the tenth expensive Lomykinym from them "does not smell."
"Workshop" or "circle" Aivazovsky - it's just no comment, I do not understand how this can be put and buy a lot of money. Who is this attribution in general can do little if anyone copies of Aivazovsky's "spank" in the time and later?
Malyshev was nice and cheap: the 75 th lot - 3 tons, 76 th - 3 tons, but did not find an amateur, but I like his stuff more vivid in color.
Spring, 84 th lot - 12 tons lift that an accurate medium for this artist's bust, I think. So he soon Zakharova "eclipse" the price.
Glushchenko was inadequate road: № 36, c /m, 35х48 - 15 tons, № 65, c /m, 34h50 - 25 tons, № 68, c /m, 34h49 - 25 tons, № 83 - x /m , 80x70, 1958 - 50 tons
Sketches for such money is hardly anyone who needs, and canvas 50-ies he has in general are bad, because are unremarkable realism.
But that's selling very respected by me, Alexander Philbert (70-th lot in life, this miniature is much nicer to live perfectly. Although there are better, of course). A trifle, but pleasant - a good artist is moving gradually to the masses.