Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 07.07.2010, 14:55 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,073
Спасибо: 6,205
Поблагодарили 6,552 раз(а) в 3,043 сообщениях
Репутация: 12904
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от SergeiSK Посмотреть сообщение
I do not argue. How many people, so many opinions. Only here for me rather strangely, when considered brilliant Warhol, Basquiat, Kosolapov, etc. Good artists they may be, but not brilliant ...
Anyway, someone feel important - for whom keep
In terms of superlatives - it is an epithet, and the money - it is money. I can understand an amateur singer of pop culture and obsch.potrebleniya Warhol, acquiring his work for big money, an amateur singer of trash culture and the city, acquiring Basquiat for big money (about Kosolapov keep quiet). It has its own aesthetics. But I do not understand who would buy Vassiliev for big money. Although it is his right. There aesthetics at risovalok.



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием