Цитата:
Сообщение от Buscador
Of course, the language will undergo great changes that for 9 centuries. Chekhov and Tolstoy already struggling to understand modern "teen" (in the sense, adolescents). Progress, unfortunately, not all is positive trends. With regard to language, it seems to me to see a progressive trend towards convergence of generally accepted concepts. And in 100 years any citizen of America will be easy to understand citizen of Russia ... There will be assimilated in linguistics. The task of linguists, teachers, writers and the state as a whole, to understand these trends ...
|
Understand trends. Instead of professional work to raise the literacy rate, adjusted to the illiterate majority.
But the question remains: "Whose fault is Russia's citizens do not know their national language?
And no brainer that the release of notorious dictionaries (in the presence of the philological community of other approaches) was proizeden not altruistic.
The idea of Esperanto byuolee 100 years. Only instead of Esperanto we got
massive borrowing of a foreign language, foreign and alien to Russian culture.
I do not know about the perspicacity of our lmteraturnyh classics, but reading "The Cherry Orchard" forget that the play was written in 1903.
I read it as the section "NEWS" FROM THE MODERN NEWSPAPER.
This, in my opinion, is a classic.
The current generation (no fault of his) knows "War and Peace" by American film.
Consequences - the results of EGE and the texts of members of the forum.
And it is - the most enlightened part of society .
