[ni_m]

In the first act of 1940 - the beginning of 1960, you can add more 'auto-destructive art "- a very interesting area, involving the creation of works of art made from a variety of materials, auto-disable after a certain period of their existence. Temporary amplitude in this case, at times, could cover a period of several seconds to twenty years. Such self-destruction might be the result of both natural processes, such as collision, decay or dematerialization, and the impact of artificially caused by factors such as fighting or confrontation between artists, scientists, engineers and so on.
The very same term - auto-destructive art - which is sometimes also used generally to describe any type of work, capable of self-transformation, was first introduced by Gustave Metzger in his manifesto of the 59 th, when he was working on his own, who became famous in European art circles of the time studies, called "political theory and practice of art," he outlined in his five manifestos. It should be noted that the original in their research were many, and presenting them to the theoretical part of his public lectures - there were the same and debate (something that we have taken some time ago called the fashionable word "discourse") - he accompanied them to demonstrate their innovative technologies creating works of art, including, for example, "painting" in acid on nylon. According to the recollections of eyewitnesses, they were so new and sometimes unexpected, that the majority of those present then, is skeptical about the possibility of being perceived as works of art.
Contemporary art in those years is extremely difficult and sometimes painful as you can see its way in life through the obstacles to recognition. However, the twenty-first century in this sense differs little from the last century - one of the most brilliant contemporary curators Andrei Erofeev earlier in Tagansky court demanded real life ..

Sometimes it seems that the last century was much more liberal