Can-can Rothko cost of money, but worth it? And more expensive every year. Picasso, of course, an innovator. Super-duper artist, but not all things are worthy of admiration. I once chtal that in some works he created just to banter. Recognized during the life of an artist, a rich, spoiled, he alleged, deliberately created some "perverted" things - like you'll see, and bought it, and still be admired ... Can bike, but maybe not. Look at the individual Jacqueline and ready to believe ...
Talent Rothko, too, should not erect an absolute. By the end of his life he has created, and very dark things that have not felt the old energy. Everyone ...
One of the works of Rothko, may not the most exemplary, but not the essence, I think they brought in Barvikha. Not sure. Who knows exactly? Who saw?
|