Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.06.2010, 01:03 Язык оригинала: Русский       #23
Бывалый
 
Аватар для Любознательный
 
Регистрация: 10.04.2010
Сообщений: 301
Спасибо: 470
Поблагодарили 326 раз(а) в 132 сообщениях
Репутация: 653
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от redbor Посмотреть сообщение
Of course mine. So I may be confusing, so your division
 - Valuable and unnecessary collectors come to the faithful.
 I'm Orthodox. And the icons I have are different.
 But the church icons to convey only the best.
 And his neighbor to bestow icons of good writing, no flaws.
 And do not say: "well, this icon to chewed corner collector is not required, but a believer would go."
Look at the beginning again. On this icon, what can we say? good is an icon or not? valuable? how?
 And you promised to answer the questions:
 "What is the artistic merit?
"What this value is being measured?".
And that's what there been written, and what it is, and not told. And want to know, that's iobraschayus with the question.
 Think. once you use this phrase, perhaps you know what it means.
Everything you write to me and quoted above, is necessary and sufficient criteria you make a criminal offense under Part 2 of the Criminal Code st.129 RF.T.e. libel - the public dissemination of false information defaming my honor and dignity. Because the site is registered on the territory of Russia, in this case is applicable Russian legislation.
You came not only for the limits of decency, but also beyond the scope of criminal law.
The basis for your insinuations served my post: "the artistic value of this icon is not. If the veneers were not included chervontsi - then virtually nothing. In this particular case, you will be guided by the faithful, not collectors."
Your habit of attributing to other your own words and expressions, may be appropriate in the Ukraine and the other reviewer.
I do not promise, and would not you promised to arrange for you to campaign against illiteracy.
And if you really interested in my opinions about the icons, it is stated in the subject line "Help evaluate the icon", the author-Reriks. My position remains unchanged: "Icons is an icon, regardless zavisimosti from its artistic merit."
My position regarding the difference between the artistic and material value of art presented in the previous message. Evaluation of the artistic value of works of art presented to me in the topic "Volkov Yefim E.?. All these topics are in this section.
I see no basis for our further correspondence, as detractors, I will not give a hand and the people of this sort does not communicate.

Posted 11 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy Посмотреть сообщение

Bredyatina kind: "defending their honor and dignity ...
I deeply regret that the honor and dignity you think bredyatinoy.
From you have I did not expect.
The essence and foundation of the dispute - over.




Последний раз редактировалось Любознательный; 12.06.2010 в 01:24. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
Любознательный вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Любознательный за это полезное сообщение:
redbor (12.06.2010)