Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.06.2010, 20:40 Язык оригинала: Русский       #56
Авторитет
 
Аватар для Art-lover
 
Регистрация: 25.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 825
Спасибо: 1,587
Поблагодарили 2,452 раз(а) в 384 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 3846
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Tasha Посмотреть сообщение
If we consider from this standpoint, the critic is not the alter ego of the artist, but rather, his psychoanalyst. The artist is not always possible to determine from which sprouts his work, from what depths of the subconscious come up certain motifs, colors, even the size of the work can speak for itself.
And soon, a good critic - fantasy artist.) After all the properties of the critic, the kind Sokurov, cause idiosyncrasy in Pavel'a. And vice versa.
And so the critic who just should not be, because it is a psychoanalyst: artists - such loonies who analyzes depths of the subconscious is not shown. For he commanded: "Love your syndrome".))
Psihokritik uncover the depth where the roots of drag artist - and all that'll be done. The roots will shrink, the audience will pozezvyvat and ozdorovevshy mentally bankrupt artist.)
So, if the "alter ego" of the criticism had not worked better for him to go to iskusstvovody. Or, at worst, in the art. )



Art-lover вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Art-lover за это полезное сообщение:
LCR (07.06.2010), NATA NOVA (06.06.2010)