Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.06.2010, 04:37 Язык оригинала: Русский       #52
Старожил
 
Регистрация: 12.06.2009
Адрес: московская область
Сообщений: 693
Спасибо: 5,700
Поблагодарили 3,377 раз(а) в 602 сообщениях
Репутация: 6618
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-lover Посмотреть сообщение
The same, but shorter: critic - the artist's alter ego.
If we consider from this standpoint, the critic is not the alter ego of the artist, but rather, his psychoanalyst. The artist is not always possible to determine from which sprouts his work, from what depths of the subconscious come up certain motifs, colors, even the size of the work can speak for itself. But by analyzing the artist's personality, a good critic is really holding his head in the history of art, from rock paintings to the present day. And finds the cultural roots, influence, etc. At the same time comparing the degree of novelty and cultural trail in the artist with the scale of his personality, the critic really can make fairly accurate predictions about the place of the creator in the history of art.
As to "tell the artist: This is hardly a real direct, but indirectly, through aid in the understanding of ourselves that is possible.
I think all I had written, is more related to art historians. But critics are looking for an artist not a place in art history, and among the artists of contemporary and modern art trends.




Последний раз редактировалось таша; 06.06.2010 в 05:04.
таша вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо таша за это полезное сообщение:
Pavel (06.06.2010), Peter (06.06.2010), SAH (06.06.2010)