Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 21.11.2008, 12:25 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 21.04.2008
Сообщений: 96
Спасибо: 26
Поблагодарили 122 раз(а) в 42 сообщениях
Репутация: 72
По умолчанию

surprised judgments of the forum - people seem to be "not far" from the art ... "Icons in the church can not be bad" - but about the candles, soot, hundreds of people during the service? you know? about that, what route we have to Sergiev Posad?
Or there about the fact that conditions on the Crimean shaft - the same as in any church? You often go there? devices that monitor temperature and humidity conditions, see?
As for LJ-nick - why is it "hysterical", or even if it was true, what attitude is his personal "anti-clericalism "???? Yes, let him at least three times likes or dislikes the ROC, it is important first of all what he says about the icon and its position as a specialist?
Well, of course, that can understand the scientific researchers and restorers of the Tretyakov Gallery ....

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от ottenki_serogo Посмотреть сообщение
Cyril, what kind of logic? robbed the church, within which these works were created, and now they say: "You spoil, we will not!
why, excuse me, the ROC must do something to return, while others do not? her alone, that I "robbed" ... let's make restitution and return all the previous owners (in this case, their heirs)? see, what then of the museum collections will ...

By the way, you know, where in six months then will all these "returned values"? Yeah, auctions ...



artemirra вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо artemirra за это полезное сообщение:
dedulya37 (21.11.2008), DSF (22.11.2008), LCR (21.11.2008), Meister (21.11.2008), Кирилл Сызранский (21.11.2008)