[As for Ecclesiastes:]
Цитата:
Сообщение от Samvel
Of course, I've been there, even before your pickup, but that's what happens. visiting tam.t.e understood little bit, as there it is impossible to go forward, or we should go forward in reverse napravlenii.Esli will understand more lyudey.to can be no progress. But whether it is good, closer to the understanding "(here I mean understandingly society, not the individual.)
|
While there is competition, there will be progress.
Understandingly company history is not known: the masses are always so tightly immersed in the arrangement of life, that they are not up to wisdom. Will it wont in the future? Maybe. Buddhist metaphysics, for instance, claim that ever happens completely universal insight, and at that point and come complete, the final end. But for the approximation of the happy ending we still have to work and work: as long as we do not understand what art is, about any revelation and dream of nothing
-------------------------
Цитата:
Сообщение от Guriev, Igor
Quote: Originally Posted by Art-lover
The confidence may be misplaced. Knowledge can be false. Faith may be superstition.
Maybe. And may not be.
So here Fifty-fifty.
|
And that, apart Fifty, maybe out of context?
The idea was that if you do not honor the hallowed tradition of the marriage bond language words and meanings, then the market will not be correct.
The examples I cited in a previous post, illustrating that in the ordinary and poetic language poorly differentiated "know" and "believe" sound, where boring linguist would use the word "certain" accent subjectivity successful adoption and opacity of its objective bases. Accordingly, the clarification of certain prerequisites shifts them to one of the poles of the scale, reliability, probability, allowing - not with kondachka, but with a high nose in the air - say "know" (how to solve the problem) or "trust" (that patience will converge). Where the case is measured referred to the scale (this whole area of our worldly occupation), knowledge and belief is mediated by a statistically and the extreme points are mutually exclusive. (If I know how to hammer a nail, you will tell, but I will not convince others, they say I believe: I can hammer a nail. And if I believe that in May 2043 on Mars will bloom branchy cranberries, then the precaution of not going backed its forecast for the words "here fail me at this place").
Читать дальше...
The situation is different in the realm of religion: it is the scope of qualitative rather than quantitative factors, this theory of probability folds. If one says "I am 99%sure that God exists," and another "I believe in God, but I attend a doubt" - is very different statements. The first quote indicates, rather, the lack of faith, the second - only about its instability.
"I know that God is" - a very strong word. It may indicate the availability of special sanctity, direct mystical experience of communion with God, about the Revelation.
Or the holy innocence. Or the careless use of the word "knowledge", to which the language is stable ties importance of verification. There is no objective procedure for checking the validity of knowledge that lies beyond all knowledge, so there is no knowledge about it. One can conclude about God through His fruit through the tradition about Him through the signs of His presence, etc. but from the bell tower of science are irrational, consequential faith opinion will not be interpreted as knowledge, so it is better summarized by the formula "I believe in God."
Inside Traditions problem of the relation of knowledge and faith looks more complicated. Accordingly, difficult to address the issue of faith and understanding - but not so that "faith and understanding - it is red and sweet."
Here, at the threshold of divinity, silent. If at least someone will replace this text pill sleeping pills, then wear the keyboard can be considered justifiable. <!--~ A ~-->