Цитата:
Сообщение от Peter
As an artist and a man who love art, I have often wondered what the critics want? "What they show in their works that are not visible to the eye, what can not be understood looking directly at the work of art? How their views contribute to the creativity of the artist, while others put a cross? "This is a subjective opinion or attempt an objective analysis of creativity?" I would like to hear the views of critics and art historians.
|
It seems to me that the task of critics to be able to analyze the processes occurring in a specific field of art and based on extensive knowledge of the work of many painters and artists for generations to conclude that the creation of a certain artist or group of artists. study of creative work of artists from different countries and time allows opreldelit degree of originality and lyrics. giftedness certain artist painter. Everything is understood in comparison, but to compare have to be very much to know and keep in mind.
Unfortunately our criticism and art history mired in commerce. and thus lost their outlook and can not compare. Many of knowledge are limited to superficial knowledge of the national art or narrowly professional knowledge given period. The overall disease-complementarity for the money, kills criticism.