[Art-lover]

I enrolled in a personal question from one of forumlyan, if I have personal reasons to advertise Brui. Reply to a private way I could not: for reasons unknown to me at the author's question put on a straitjacket and cut his communications channels. Therefore, answer here:
With this artist I was not personally acquainted, and his paintings are "alive" not seen, so that the other reason to write about him, besides the fact that it is interesting to fit into the subject under discussion, I do not. And as far as references to the artist used for his advertising, easy to be determined after full-time acquaintance with his work: if they are good - then it is advertising, if not - then antiadvertising <!--~ a ~-->.

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Faith and understanding - it is red and sweet.
Red is not opposed to sweet.

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

For example, I punctured a tire on a bicycle.
I believe that I can repair the bike, and I know how to do it.
Where is the opposition?

The relationship between faith and understanding of the complex than between "red" and "sweet". When we say that we understand how to fix a bicycle, in this discourse to "understand" tantamount to "know". But faith and knowledge is clearly correlated: if we know, we need not believe. And we believe in what they do not know.

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It's not the" instability "of understanding (in life in general, all unstable, as we know, apart from faith in God, if it is strong), and that understanding is the thing dynamic.
Even their parents understand the child differently, and more interesting to understand this sense than incomplete understanding (and understanding of the definition can not be complete) reduced to just "misunderstanding."
Or, in your opinion, misunderstanding can be небанальным?

Great question!
Let's start with the fact that the identity of knowledge and understanding in your example with the bike is difficult to reconcile with the statement: "Understanding, by definition, can not be complete." If you know (know) how to fix the wheel, then your understanding is complete.

Hegel distinguished between "bad" and the true infinity. Similarly, we can speak of "bad" and "true" misunderstanding.
In the first case, lack of understanding could be filled by one or other end procedures (learning, thinking, knowledge). At the output we have the "banal" understanding, whether it has become (static) or becoming a (dynamic).
To deal with the second case, we turn to the relation between Cataphotic (yes) and apophatic (negative) theology. Last of the Orthodox tradition, is the highest, for comprehension of God through what he is not more adequate to its object, than what it is. Nature Deity prohibitively world, the Creator and the creature are incommensurable. And if we still strive to comprehend God - knowing that we can not comprehend - we find ourselves in a fundamentally irreversible misunderstanding.
But even in this area is possible some experience. This experience and expertise can be called a "true" misunderstanding: such a definition would be far better to express its essence than the phrase "experience of understanding." "True" misunderstanding is understanding "небанальное.

Читать дальше... 

I guess that it is through art for us may appear, it becomes "visible" parts of the infinitely complex pattern of relationships and connections that arise during the implementation experience of mankind "true" misunderstanding. Art can be a universal model medium capable of expressing vague "images" of that experience. But under what conditions?
In search of definitions of such art can go on the road Cataphatic: it gb free and open to the deep intuitions refleksiruyuschim (aspiring to identify its essence) ...
Is it possible for the apophatic way, leaving the requirement of reflection, but at the same time focusing on the negative definitions of art. It seems preferable to the second path (actually, this topic and came in line with this approach.)
Just as the conscious failure to conceiving of God does not diminish the desire of the soul to God and postulated the impossibility of understanding art and its artifacts can only strengthen the eros that brings one to the art of those who possess such a eros.
You can enjoy the arts and instinctively, without conscious awareness. Understand - this is a luxury, designed for those who want to afford it. For those who want ultimate luxury "negative" approach to the understanding of art - not castration, but very soon Viagra <!--~ a ~-->: work with the paradoxes inherent in this approach, makes it easier to break through to the merits of the case through the sticky swamps of banal narratives, filling the heads of participants artist. processes, and dedicated to the art texts. Alas, this approach is burdened by major shortcomings: assumed familiarity with the history and boltologiey contemporary art, a culture of thinking, development of intuition and the notorious eros ...