Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-lover
try to assign a work of art is not an act of delayed understanding, but there is an existential act of changing the modus vivendi (way of life) of the acquirer, removes the dilemma" to have or be. "
The essence and implications of this act are subjective, and transcendent, so it can not be regarded as something utilitarian, like the special use value on the art market.
Acquisition of art objects for the sake of their utility or other perceivable qualities are ignoring the specificity of art objects, ie use them for other purposes.
|
Once again (for those who do not understand )
"a prime)
The act of assigning somehow removes the question "have or to be"?
The effects of the act of the estate "is not" use value "?
Acquisition for understandable quality=misuse?
Have I neponyala? (Do I understand that not understood?) (Dissenting because it is not clear)
Can the same thing (but without the pearl buttons)?
Added after 6 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от ranzher
and the aesthetic effect of the product is perceived by us directly through the sense of avoiding speculative logic.
|
"The aesthetic effect is very subtle and unexplained concept (" all time "). which can not be considered outside the specific location, time, moral and aesthetic priorities. (IMHO, is if "without pearlies")
'Aesthetic effect "- the notion of a higher degree" deeply personal "..