Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.11.2008, 09:54 Язык оригинала: Русский       #66
Гуру
 
Аватар для dedulya37
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2008
Сообщений: 5,017
Спасибо: 5,605
Поблагодарили 6,167 раз(а) в 1,669 сообщениях
Репутация: 9525
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw Посмотреть сообщение
Creativity her quite nothing. Regarding the same customs, should not be persecuted and humiliated, and submit to the court for illegal actions.
As for creativity - someone like that.
As for the court - she does not want to be in vain to pull his name and indirectly expose his father - Salakhova Taira Teymurovicha (Taimur-Ogly), because case will be shirokoobsuzhdaemym and journalists will necessarily refer to the parent, and children, as you know, for the parents are not responding.
Generally in the art world to be a child of parents and also known to be an artist (in the broadest sense of the word), ie continue the dynasty, it is very difficult.
Good examples of creative dynasties little (family Mikhalkov-Konchalovsky - I speak from memory)
Make sure there are people who will compare the parents and children and say "Fedot, but not the same. Therefore, children two ways: either continue the "theme" of the parents (M. Konchalovsky, E. Naumova, M. Kugach) or to work in his style (A. Salakhova, K. Papikyan, all children VK Nechitailo, grandchildren, Yuri Petrovich Kugacha)
Contemporary artists, children live in another world-state, they have their perception-vision, his creativity, and judged and compared them to tend the old-fashioned parents. But they do not have to explain everything as they see this world!
Here is my opinion.



dedulya37 вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо dedulya37 за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (12.12.2008), Glasha (19.11.2008), Vladimir (19.11.2008)