I'm not saying that Rothko's quite mediocre artist, but cost tens of millions he could not because he was not an innovator, perhaps as one of the brightest representatives of contemporary art it can cost a few million, but certainly on a par with Van Gogh, Picasso, Klimt and etc. Like should not cost so much money shelves. For what? for the fact that he "invented" a method of drawing pictures by spray paint. So no, in the early 1900's, the Surrealists used this method, throwing in the picture legkorazryvaemye tubes of paint. Kooning innovator? Again there is enough to turn to the works Kudryasheva .. I'm not saying that they have no right to be on the art market, but to lift up their relevance to the level of the great Picasso, Gauguin, Klimt, in my opinion, quite impossible ...
|