Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
paint lies not so, as the dry
|
That is, just, and difficult to discern at this resolution.
Added after 3 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
To some (tiny) error in the proportions seen
|
What specifically do you mean? Give examples.
Posted 13 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
And besides, do not forget that in the era of Hals, Vermeer human eye was not at all familiar with the film-photo optics (except that the camera obscura, by the way, I recommend to try)
The eye is familiar with the film-photo, even the track feels different ... (Also the permission to do so does not need anymore to observe that what is "not so)
|
NATA NOVA, with examples, please.
Added after 25 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
That group nevermeerovskaya. a hand (in drinking women) nehalsovskaya. That smear is not the same "
|
In what sense? Explain, please.
Posted 27 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
That smear is not the same "
|
And yet, difficult to discern smear on such photographs. Smear here can not be seen.
Added after 29 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler
I Vermeer is more refined ...
|
K-Maler, in what sense?
Added after 36 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
I understand. Seagull had in mind a different motivation. This, too, because you can feel ..
|
I think that you can ... But in the same way, we can just convince yourself that you feel something (ie, deceive). Likewise, you can believe in "the other side" (so to speak). That is, in fact, that the real thing.
«The devil is in the Details»
NATA NOVA, I am fully assuming that you all can see it. But I would like more details on each issue. (At least, for an interesting conversation)