Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
This fact, makes the case, at least, with interest to him and what he had done. Do not you think?
|
Of course, (With the greatest interest at that!)
And I do not like espert, but as praktiruyuschy (past all realistic art school drill) udozhnik say ... Of course, great pieces and paintings there. but then again ... (see above) where a little "wrong" there the little "wrong" ..
I did feel like an artist .. For example, when you write alla-primnymi "fast" (halsovskimi) strokes, the paint does not rest as the dry, and that some (tiny) error in the proportions noted, high resolution is not required .. And besides, do not forget that Hals, Vermeer era human eye was not at all familiar with the film-photo optics (except that the camera obscura, by the way, I recommend to try)
The eye is familiar with the film-photo, even the track feels different ... (Also the permission to do so does not need anymore to observe that what is "wrong")
Again (classic already) How many hundreds (!) Mayatskih fakes experts have missed?
Added after 2 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
Message from tchaika
Clearly, an adventurer. The purpose of art - the other.
I did not understand. Could you expand your thoughts?
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от tchaika
It is clear that an adventurer. The purpose of art - the other.
|
I understand. Seagull had in mind a different motivation. This, too, because you can feel the ..