Eugene, with a history Bochkaryov we know well, because it makes the examination of these works in an open criminal case.
[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
Dear
qwerty,
We raised the archives for the 464 contract. Usually, we give an explanation for the lead examinations only to the person who was deliverers work. However, given that you have quoted the conclusion of our opinion, the confidentiality we can not be broken.
I agree that we as all people sometimes make mistakes, and we recognize our mistakes and correct them if you really are wrong and that there is evidence, but this is not the case.
I bring you an excerpt from an internal report of an expert technologist - organics:
Organic materials of soil and paint layer:
Sizing - glyutinovy (skin, bone) glue.
Binder layers of paint - oil and the resin (resin) and wax in a relatively stable share for the presence of metal stearates.
Oil-resin-wax composition stably detectable in all investigated colorful layers in the presence of a significant proportion of stearates of metals indicates the manufacturing process used paint. Stearates metals as stabilizers gemogenizatorov and colorful mixtures have proliferated in the late 40s of the twentieth century in paints for industrial use - GF Payne "Technology of organic coatings", v.2, 1963., P.295-302.
Used Methods: Mikrohimiya, histochemistry, thin layer chromatography, infrared spectroscopy.
Conclusion: Colors on this kind of compositions of organic materials in the presence of metal stearates as stabilizers and homogenisers colorful suspensions were made in the second half of the twentieth century.
As to the reason the catalog release in 1997. We can, of course, be wrong, but at the Foundation's website is no reason to directories 1997. Perhaps you mean monograph Stefan Gronert, Alexej Jawlensky. Grosse Meditation: 'Verhaltene Glut', Frankfurt /Leipzig, 1997?
Regarding the Fund Yavlensky, we all sin, we have a complex region, the link below to confirm.
"ArtChronika 5-6 2005 p.54-55:
http://artsg.ru/reviews/2005/item-18/
In fact, our further discussions to nothing lead. We have no problem convicting someone of something, does. We just try to be objective and fair. I am sorry that you have formed a negative attitude to our company, gladly would have tried to convince you, answering all your questions. If the job is yours, we can make a second examination free of charge, to show and explain all the data obtained. We do not stand still, and since 2005 we have a lot has changed in the methodological basis.
Sincerely, Denis Lukashin