-----------------------
SergeiSK: After all I conclude the dispute. All ... I think once again the dispute meaningless. -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------
I was told they stop fighting, while they themselves ran for patrons (for examples)? 8)
Better had no nihhh. You, as warned, the picture was removed, but I managed to see them, because let me speak.
Here and agreed to the absurd - the great tradition of the great schools illustrate the titles: "All authors of the popular, well-deserved and so on, and pictures of themselves ...
Do you really think that the "Firefighter" - is good? I'm not talking about the muzzle face, but about painting ... What's wrong with that "work has a collector and museum value and can be creative ... in museum collections? In my opinion, was terrible ... the red-green ...
"Russian field" ... a quality painting, in his time, hung in the shabby rural clubs across the country, in nemerenom number. She remembered the academic motto: "more dirt - more communication; third-work is interesting only because the name and only because of 1940. What kind of infusion into the global culture we are talking about?
Nalbandian, agree with Eugene, it turns out the best in any case, made strong, worthy of the school.
The girl was left without comment, it has something with legs (though perhaps a photographic deception) ...
So, not all of them were able to better nonconformists. 8)
Sorry, this is just my subjective opinion.
--------------------------
nikola: Yes, there were many masters. Learn painting was who. Those zakonchilv '40s and '60s, all beautifully painted, boldly and competently written.
Must add, it is surprising educated, intelligent people.
What they are deep, not superficial. Apparently in the works of all
present.
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
At the expense of surprise educated and intelligent, you are hot. Among them were a number of cannibals (with many of their followers knew personally).
Even without any ideological motive, purely artistic: "academic realism" does not tolerate the slightest willful interpretation, considering it (treatment of) a crime against himself.
Your selection (p. 11) shows, in addition to literacy drawing and bold letters, an interesting trend - so handsome, paint and will paint kilometers. Who impersonal interesting demonstration of skill for skill? Where Petrov-Vodkin?
In a school textbook, it seems to re-lit or history, really hate myself wounded Commissioner, but really liked the way it is written. Championed by himself. Won painting. And here, sorry, that should win? Love for vasts? So her, and so abundant ...
Look at the work of the Middle School, where pictures are more interesting, you know why? Because it taught the "formalists", those who do not fit into the system and was banished to the outskirts of the empire, away from the capital.
|