Цитата:
Сообщение от Peter
You see, I was a principled opponent of such "art." I consider it one more step on the path utrachivaniya of art that comes from the simultaneous experience of the artist in the process rukodeliya.Eto "art" ever closer to human robotic sostoyaniyu.Uzhe forgotten art of writing, when writing bunal emotional energiticheskuyu component ."... letter was written with a trembling hand, in some places the ink blurred ... "That we are unlikely to see and pochuvstvuem.A some energy in an exquisite painting in handicraft embroidery, in this painting in the late kontsov.Seychas ELEKTON letters "OK" and "Until the connection." There is a difference? "The same with the digital" painting ". When the turner had carved on a lathe, even complex parts that would only be soulless zhelezka.Dazhe if the machine kompyutor.Ya can not stop this slide into emptiness and impoverishment iskusstva.Ya forced to live by these rules, but I'm sorry that after a number of years of the term "digital painting" disappears, the word "digital" because that another painting is no longer.
|
That's the most amazing thing is that I absolutely agree with you.
I even now our call:
The era of automation masterpieces.
A method for obtaining a personal "masterpiece" in man leveled before clicking on one button. As a result, people often do not think about what he sees, does not notice that around. He began to look smaller. And art has become cruder and simpler. From TV and computer screen to screen and mobile screen digital camera.
This is a sick topic.
As you know, digital painting, I am not here because they work the same principles as in classical painting. The same laws and skills, but to bypass the problems of working with materials.
But I'm referring to the automation and laziness on the perception of a sketch of the photo, even if they are made in oil.