[Roman Guro]

curious,

Computer killed the book.
Maybe kill paintings, graphics, and in 3D - and sculpture.
Perhaps.

Computer do not know how - this is just a tool.
It's like saying "Give me a good brush, and I become an artist"
Cinema revived image, 3D technology revived sculpture.
That's all.
To make a good 3D model, you must be a good sculptor.
The bad they can not do anything, the computer can help him.
To draw on the computer must be able to paint, to know the laws of perception, color, composition, anatomy, etc.
All the same way.
And even if your computer ever (so far, and hints at it not) learn to read your imagination, I'm afraid that postonennogo perception, you will still need all of this knowledge to convey his vision.
Otherwise there will be quality amateur photos.
Even now, beauty surrounds us everywhere.
The artist just throws away too much, and highlights important.

I liked your work, but I can not imagine them hanging in his apartment.
While not imagine.

Thank you.
This is no longer a question of technical performance)

Added after 25 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

Roman Guro, you talk about a new napravlenii.Na your opinion what is art different from the blundering (not in the sense of novelty technology performance), how to determine whether the work is a work of art? ( what you pay for something <!--~ a ~-->?

Without attempting to bring the truth of the wording of the encyclopedia.
She's quite accurate))

Art - figurative comprehension of reality, the process or result of expression of the inner world in an artistic way, a creative combination of elements in such a way that reflects the ideas, feelings or emotions.
Science and art - two ways of understanding the world.

From my own experience.
Skill convey feelings, emotions and feelings so that they understand the audience at the same emotional level.

In this sense, digital art course art, differing only instrument technique.