Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 04.05.2010, 19:51 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3
Banned
 
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,380 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2190
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Roman Guro Посмотреть сообщение

1) How it could be interesting for development and investment?[/B]
....
2) On the other, often the mere fact that the work is drawn on the computer is perceived negatively.
People ask, what and how it is drawn.
Working people like, they show an interest in it, but knowing that the work drew on the computer, much interest is lost.
Not just watching like.

Why ..
0) I guess your work can be compared with the works of good photographers. Recently, a similar theme about the photograph was discussed at the forum.

1) Personally, I believe that despite the personal component introduced by the computer designer, investments in this area are inadequate. After all, if such work can be repeated millions of times without losing quality and for little money. You can simply steal the file. With this painting will not work - often the artist himself unable to repeat the mood and emotion, which he failed on a previous version of the same picture.

2) Why are people without interest? Maybe it's the price? If you are bidding on a print that is comparable to the price of a decent pictorial works, then everything is clear. How much (and what format) sell your work?
I think the price should be the price of a similar poster. There are, of course, the American exception. But it does not understand the reason! So American-expensive photo can cost only in the country, which itself prints the money and the world must already worldwide 13 trillion dollars.



Черномашенцев Владимир вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Черномашенцев Владимир за это полезное сообщение:
sur (05.05.2010), Любознательный (04.05.2010)