Цитата:
Сообщение от SergeiSK
artcol,
Take a lump of World realistic painting 1930-60 GG It is realistic, Picasso, Dali, Lansky and others do not. And compare .. I see that from the U.S. to China, from Scandinavia to the Australians (not aboriginal) was the same trend of realistic painting. In the Soviet Union added the prefix "a social ..." And what of it? Painting has become worse than once?
So it's not a lyumpenizirovannosti, withdrawal can be no question. Remarks that "there is no art, no beauty salon" also left as your personal opinion. And why "in Ukraine? So right? Then write Tallinn and call blacks African-Americans.
|
No, not so simplistic (read, "vulgar") approach. Fine arts are constantly looking for and invent new artistic means. Realism, not realism - in order that relates to art - it is not ideological, and classification attributes relating to a method, not to the form of reflection of reality. Socialist realism same - it sovreshenno another song. Crush it started with a form (the vanguard) and finished method (see below). Totalitarizm, however: D We were lucky tovarischchi have not lived at that time. So.
Shl You know that expression "the square-cluster method"?