Shall make a reservation that I am omnivorous, not divide artists to socialist realists, nonconformists, landscape and marine painters, dark and cheerful, and I divide them in the art and artists. Can not afford to admire and chairman of the kolkhoz ", if it catches, not to mention landscapes and still lifes ...
-----------
SergeiSK: This debate will never end. It is not art, but in the ideology of each party to the dispute. Who's lives spiritually, he even loves ...
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Just still in the art. What ideology is "Lilac" Konchalovsky?
With regards to contemporary fashion trends, so no one argues that all unqualified masterpieces. Rubbish - more than enough art festival - generally solid profonatsiya. Yes, and nonconformists are all different.
-----------
SergeiSK: Still Socialist Realism as an independent direction, there is not a momentary fashion, but in a separate slice of world culture
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Yes, as an independent direction exists. You can love, admire and admire the skill, but argued that this slice of world culture - an attempt to jump above their heads. This is a historical, political, whatever the cut, affecting the culture of one country, and to world cultural processes, he has nothing to do. Otherwise, Chinese consumer goods - also cut global culture (caught good quality products).
Why, trying to shove Socialist Realism in world culture, it surely must be compared with non-conformism? Let us then you have a grown-up - with Van Gogh, Schiele, Modigliani ...
I'm afraid, only one Morandi, speaking of the contribution to world culture, will outweigh all the popular and highly respected together.
Nonconformists are interesting not because they fought with socialist realism, but because, being excluded from official culture and fenced off from the modern world of artistic processes that gave rise to being in this confined space, something new and most valuable personality.
Krasnopevtsev said one thing, Roginsky - another, Yakovlev - the third ... A socialist realists, all taken together and individually, they said the same thing, claiming to be different.
-----------
SergeiSK: but agree, even by academics, social realism technique is much higher than any nonconformists. So painting class above! Compare the "Lilac" Konchalovsky and any nonconformists. And tell me one you like more? Be honest ...
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Honestly? Then say the words Norstein Yu: "The ability to draw - not the fact of art."
|