Цитата:
Сообщение от Tata
Tjutchev I understand this work is sold as Kustodiyev? Are there too, she licked for this size, and yes even oil? I do not remember a similar story Kustodieva things in oils such a small size. Maybe I'm wrong? I'm not a big fan of this artist.
|
Tata, for this size it is not too "licked". In Kstodieva is "licked" the work and smaller and it is oil. As for the plot, then Boris Mikhailovich work with such a plot, but strangely not much at all. But they do not afford much, but very little. In so little that we can not say that he had a something special rule in choosing the size to work with such a plot. On a well-established rule, we can say that when pictures of a plot and size very much. Yes, and then a stretch. Kustodiyev in all his work was original. I do not see any reason to suspect it in automatism. Why did not he write a naked woman is a size? He's an artist, not a machine!
Personally, I believe that the discrepancy between the size of the plot and the argument is very minor. And it can be considered only as an auxiliary in the reasoning. Yes, and then applied only to certain artists. Artist with a special method.
In our case, we could help other work Kustodiev. Which is very similar to our fake. This is a striking similarity and should have been alerted of the potential buyer. The fact that Boris even in the creation of small-sized works were an artist, he never repeated. To imagine that he simply copied his own work to create another impossible. This is not the quality.
Here, the work of Boris Mikhailovich Kustodieva and falshak.: