It's very nice, almost all were sentenced to Sarnitsa screen painting. Even without looking at the attached photos.
In the picture message 1 in the middle (three quarters) have same pictures on the front and the side wall Sarnitsa. They have no relation to the pattern.
Tray native - not zastarenny artificially. He just did not specially washed free - to confirm the time by the nature of hand lapping the sole product (see the risks to the scanned soles). Of particular note is that the stamp was subjected to grinding of (see the first of the now attached photo).
This thing is a kind of dissonance. Perhaps because of the traditional technologies lag from conception of the artist. This is what attracted the early European porcelain. His mistakes, which are now no longer even repeats craftsman. Having learned from the experience of their predecessors.
It is difficult to agree with the view inexpressiveness (formlessness) products. No accounting for tastes - attached Maker Malevich (middle photo), it really looks different.
But the textured surface (not linked to the painting) table of products characterized as products under the early and mid 18 th century. Return to the textured surface of table items in the first third of the 20 th century occurred on a different circuit technology development Porcelain affairs and other tastes of the public (artists).
And the last comment. Flow-line production really allows you to achieve mass production. The price of technology changes with the simultaneous loss of quality. Hand-painting begin to be only unique things. There was a decal.
And in this case, we have no means a unique little thing, with over-and underglaze painting. Must submit themselves how she was fired. As a result, one of them fired at Sarnitsa flowed one of the walls - but the product is not a thing of the marriage (see the last of the attached photo).
And it says it a lot. First of all, on the creation of work - no later than 18 centuries.
I think so. Dissuade me could not.
Thanks to everyone who took part in the discussion.
|