Distortion of reality in art, in particular, in painting, not only permissible, but inevitable, they occur in every work of art. Applied
deliberately, these distortions often are key to understanding the thoughts, which he wanted to express the artist. But then the whole structure of the product should speak the audience that he should not take literally depicted, and move when considering the picture from the language of ordinary perception to language arts. In this case, it seems to me, "commissioned painting" says close to a literal reproduction of reality, and then its distortion perceived as a mistake. Gentle slope of water surface in the audience would assume at the very front - in accordance with visual perception, but the picture it - in the background, and it looks unnatural.
Цитата:
Сообщение от mark4445
If we assume that the direction of flow of the river is towards the horizon line
|
Then the whole plane of the water table should be slightly (!) Tilted from the viewer. At least, that would have her portray an artist, to the movement of water passed over the audience. But, again, that photo was taken ill, and possibly all of our arguments do not refer to the picture, but to the distorted picture.