[qwerty]

Сообщение от ACG

presents you beautiful, but let me argue in essence. Hurt the eyes two or three of your categorical statements that can speak any language of negligence or lack of understanding about the essence of the issue. "Today there is no hundred percent methods for determining the time of job." In fact, there is a whole arsenal of professional methods for determining the time of job. Just each method has its accuracy /inaccuracy. The professionalism of an expert technology is a skilful choice of the complex suitable methods to reduce errors /error

You do not grasp its meaning, written by me. Push: I wrote exactly the same as you: every technological method has a precision of \ error, ie any method is not a hundred percent, and the "professional expert technician" - this is the human factor, that any study should take into account as multiplying the probability of error.

Сообщение от ACG

failure to understand this, perhaps, explains why both your assertion:" I met a lot of examples where such organizations, for example, shirokorazreklamirovanny Artkonsalting, were mistaken as to one or the other side: the real work say, the thirties of the twentieth century attributirovali postwar period, and, conversely, fakes, made in the eighties, attributirovali twenty years of the last century.
About the other "similar organization" do not know, but I know that Art Consulting for 60 years, as you assert, is not mistaken. If you do not exaggerate "just to be witty, call work and give us details of departure so that we can raise the archives and together with you to ensure the veracity of your statement.

I understand that, as a member of Artkonsaltinga, you have to try to defend their honor, but you are doing is in vain, as all professional participants of the art market and collectors absolutely all examination are initially with skepticism. Sometimes it helps. A couple of years ago I bought for 15 cents oil Yavlensky. The price was so, because the seller thought he had at the hands of imitation Yavlensky. The reason this is the examination performed by your Artkonsaltingom (contract number 464 of 30 June 2005), resulting in the conclusion, I quote: "The totality of identified materials used in the film, used in painting from the second half of the twentieth century." As I have previously encountered with your mistakes and felt a little versed in Jawlensky, I sent the work to the experts of the Fund Yavlensky (Alexej von Jawlensky-Archiv SA), Locarno - an organization that is recognized worldwide and the only neobsuzhdaemym Expert on Jawlensky. Soon, I was told that this work is known to specialists, moreover, it has been included in the catalog-reasonable (№ 1997, str.260), released many years ago, and technological expertise has confirmed that this is not a copy and original, with what they told me and congratulated.
I have some other examples, the confirmed facts, but more on this subject, I do not want to spread - being sorry.

Сообщение от ACG

"specialist in fifty percent of cases rather than five minutes to figure out the real thing or not." Although this assertion is difficult to argue, but it is too trivial: in reality, the problem of determining the authenticity of things is often just to make sure to identify - with the "expert" whether we are dealing with and what kind of case in question - when he "understood" right or wrong ...
Suffice it to recall the situation with perelitsovkami, which directly affected many distinguished experts. Only technological expertise allowed us to determine that the picture perelitsovana

And here you are, it seems, are not in the subject. The situation with perelitsovkami just were possible because, under our Kiselev and Shishkin, to adjust the work of Western artists, performed at the same time , so they work safely carried on the technological expertise, including you knowing that you did not catch the essence.