Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
" This technology allows you to completely recreate the immortal masterpiece on a natural canvas to reproduce the finest nuances of color and chiaroscuro, to convey the character and texture of the smear. Persists even print time as craquelure. In contrast to the art of copies to be performed oil on canvas by professional artist-copyist, digital art reproductions - not imitation, but exact facsimile reproduction of the original. "
|
If the original was scanned on a professional scanner, and then the color and contrast were matched exactly like the original, and the printer provides a fair resolution of at least 2400 dpi, then - yes, in full view of authenticity. But with the texture of the stroke, they put it mildly, probed. The printer, especially with high-resolution prints on a flat surface, and the relief stroke (often playing a major role), he can not play physically.
However, the relief and stroke can also be reproduced (not in kind, but in the brain of the viewer), but this is a different kind of prints.
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
These two image professionals therefore used a personal label to describe their limited-edition art prints created using Epson Professional photo printers.
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA
It turns out that there is no difference, what is the point mislead (or it simply: "hang noodles")
|
Perhaps the whole point - in the phrase "limited-edition art prints". Ie actually proposed making high-quality low-circulation of copies, that's all. A didzhigrafiya "- apparently, the word had been invented in order to better attract customers. As in his time the word "Xerox" instead of "Electrophotography".