Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
State can not and should ensure that demand for local artists. The State has the necessary instruments, including fiscal, in order to create a demand for this enabling environment - many believe that it is part of the state's functions
|
On the edge of the memory is displayed when, as in the early 90s something imposed it is the State - the acquisition of works of art (it is possible that under the sponsorship of art projects) expended amounts are not taxed. This has led to surge in purchases of contemporary art. However, it quickly died down, it seems, because of money-laundering. In principle, the barrier machinations to put it would be easy - if artists and others involved in the process of a person should have to pay tax, then no one would have to sign fake papers for the purchase of 10 000, if there really was 1-2.
I want to say that she agreed - at
word for the development of the art market (and in general, global - culture!) Is capable of (we!) To create precisely the state. What does not exclude state funding of individual projects in the state, city, district and others, in descending order, levels. But is not the principal.
On the other hand, as an artist, more like to believe that the pictures bought for the love of art and interest to a particular author, but it seems that there are all mixed up, including the love of money or the interior.
Well, that, whatever the motive, then a man pulled and starts sinking
.