Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.03.2010, 00:53 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1317
Banned
 
Регистрация: 17.02.2010
Адрес: Ukraine , Kiev
Сообщений: 333
Спасибо: 166
Поблагодарили 394 раз(а) в 180 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 24
Репутация: 789
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
I myself do not think the state should intervene in matters of art - very well see how it turns out, both in the USSR and France - but noart is largely rights. I am almost sure that the translation for the forum article on the state support of abstract expressionism (but I will not look - too long), try to find it, Constantine. It tells how the U.S. managed to deprive the European art of leadership in contemporary art - not an easy task

On the other hand, you think, what all these gentlemen Gagosian with Consort come to Russia, look out for promising authors? No, people here vparivat wealthy people the contents of their bins.
It is a vicious circle - the Russians willing to invest in art, buying works of western artists because of their disproportionately greater liquidity, respectively, the Russian domestic market of art, devoid of the flow of money, can not stand up ...
"They have even developed a clear doctrine on the subject. And it all comes down to one thing - money flowing into Western markets.
All the major institutions are built there. /And all is arranged so that we went to them - but not with the art - and with the money. The art they have enough, they would have money -))
Not for nothing, they opened a gallery in Moscow, not in order that would educate the Russian in the trends of modern art - they need the money. In these galleries of Russian artists are hard to find.
On that not all so good and innocent.



noart вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо noart за это полезное сообщение:
L-ana64110 (28.03.2010), Pavel (28.03.2010)