The artist-gallery owner, once again about the relationship
 

Once again, the relationship artist-gallery owner.
In odnog my friend, very good artist, there was such a case. One galeristka asked her paintings on sale in the CHA. Sales nebylo rather gallery owner did not pay the money the artist and the artist decided to take the work, the more that the work was selected. Gallerist once exposed conditions, I made my work in the frame and agree to return only after payment of the artist frames on a fairly large amount. That such a conflict. Does the right of gallery owner not to give work without frames or an artist should plapit for frames that are not necessary.

Treaty signed on cooperation? If there is nothing written down about it, then picks up the work and all. You can pull pictures from their frames.
Actually, this is not legally illegally retain copyright of the \\\\ property of others; in possession of the picture, if the author demands to return. A good lawyer to find and to "teach" gallerist "manners."
By the way, drawing in the frame, must also be specified in writing.

A similar situation.
Rama not only that expensive, they are still bulky - a lot of space is occupied.
But for some reason are very fond of the mouse.
:confused:

With frames, this is a very common technique. The French have this same standard to simplify this time. There is no need to order each time frame under each job, you can just take a frame of appropriate size. It is much cheaper and can take a frame for hire. I suggested in the frame store their work and they hung in the window.

 
In fact, it is not clear how this situation developed. After the oral discussion of the frames between the artist and gallery owner had to be, at least by phone. Add frame gallerist also not a problem, they can sell to other artists, ordering them under stretchers ...