Friends, is it possible without fanaticism?
 

Interesting topic about the sixties is closed. When a verbal squabble (fortunately?) Was not present ..
I wonder why, why, any topic that affects our past, instead of the exchange of ideas and facts into a mixing (you know what), and personality assessments? (To my utter regret, this could not be avoided and esteemed LSR, the return of which many have been eagerly awaiting).

Any phenomenon is no "one color" ..
Why must go (obtain) "barricade"? (With the indispensable, requiring the person?) Is it hard to hold them captive?
Why is everyone and everything, if not share, we must deny (not very civilized means of discussion)?
Let's try it without the bigotry!
I wish all the balance of the soul ..

And it is instead to understand.

About art.
I read about the Sixties, and wondered "why the topic was closed for takeoff? As his mouth gagged.
I argue LSR-Is not for fame and money go, you go there? And when you have had a bummer fan here. In the west of its artists in bulk. All the stories about the great sixties simply ridiculous and not only me, but mostly tamoshnem artists. Sam heard on RFI. All these myths about Kabakov clean-local chippie, where he was in the wake of anti-Soviet and anti Russianism, but the wave has passed and the silence ...
I do not quite understand why all the time, all amateurs clung to Malevich. Malevich, the great Soviet artist, if someone would have told him otherwise, that would be bad. Ignorance Hood. Heritage is not a reason to conclude. Malevich, the most striking artist, even for his time and no one is prevzashel in this, and the brightness is the most important quality in a painting. In this Malevich only slightly inferior to Matisse.
"Students" as Malevich entirely sulfur, as the prison walls, and so mediocre.

Now I understand.