![]() |
Pinacoteca increases its exhibition space, paying no attention to criticism
Pinacoteca increases its exhibition space, paying no attention to criticism
Arri Bele, "Le Monde, 05/06/2010 An interesting precedent - in France, the country (almost) of state capitalism, recently opened at the general amazement of the public private museum protivopostoit system before - with success. This article, of course, there is no on povtorivshih, nor in other Russian Internet sources - they are interested in such stories rarely, so do not say never. I translated it so that the Russian people have still a little enlightenment, and then feed him there alone already translated into Russian and published many times in news stilted and meaningless speeches of officials on the occasion of the infamous exhibition in Paris. In January 2011 Pinakothek, one of the very few private museums in Paris, will open a new exhibition space in 3000 square meters. m. It will be exhibited permanent collection, with a total of works granted by private collectors in the long-term storage. Among those works, according to director Marc Restellini Pinakothek, "Rembrandt, Tintoretto, several Picasso, Derain, Pollock, Severini. I think that we will have Bush, Peter de Hooh and other important Dutch artists of the XVI and XVII centuries.. "
Читать дальше...
|
Цитата:
Like all unusual, I reread and marvel dayus again ... Added after 35 minutes Цитата:
http://www.pinacotheque.com/fr/accueil.html |
Yes, indeed, an interesting character - Mr. Mark Restellini. Founder and Director of the new private museum Pinakothek in Paris, art historian, art critic. I was at his conference and noticed his independence in his judgments. Among the questions he was asked, was this: "You seem not particularly interested in" modern art "(" art contemporain "). Why?" Answer: "Yes, of course, good artists. Sometimes I see something remarkable. But when I come to Fiac (Contemporary Art Fair in Paris), I have become discouraged by the level of works. Kept saying:" This Fiac wonderful. " And if you argue, you find a fool. For example, I am not interested in Jeff Koons (Jeff Koons). I tell you this frankly, and this is what many think, not daring to say.
|
Mark Rasstellini, I love you!
|
Цитата:
Цитата:
Цитата:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=45755http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...postcount = 20http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...1&postcount=20 |
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Ticket sales can not produce the same amount (and recently I translated the article about the Centre Pompidou in Metz, which stated that self-financing of the museum will be 1 million euros, you can not build a small Pinacoteca 8 times more?). I will try to find information. She found the note, which states that the Pinacoteca able to open thanks to the support of Japan's "King of Property" (the highest name is not cited). Surely there are other metseny. |
Well, yes. This leads to the conclusion that is not due to "grants and subsidies, but for donations.
But this is essentially the same thing. Added after 1 minutes Apparently, the Japanese have a large collection. |
Цитата:
Цитата:
http://www.rfi.fr/acturu/articles/105/article_1306.asp Added after 7 minutes Цитата:
http://www.e-yakimono.net/html/karat...t-2004-jt.html |
Цитата:
In general, the museum can not be self-sustainable by definition. There are two trends, the French - public funding and, accordingly, the status of civil servants for museum workers, and the U.S. - private funding, that is, appeal to the patron. Both have positive and negative sides (one day I gathered the material, which describes in detail the operation of the American Museum of the system, I think I called the plot "Museums in America" or something like that, but on the French system has been translated by me annual report Louvre): for the American system is characterized by instability of funding - private money very quickly and dramatically respond to the changing economic market fluctuations - a trading approach to art, aggressive marketing, the French - the predominance of "procurement" and political correctness in modern art, institutional rigidity, arrogance and neglect to the public ... It should be noted, however, that the recent strategy of the state museums close to the principles of private (Policy blockbusters, etc.) - apparently, poorly fed them state :D Of course, I, as befits any self-respecting anarchist-antigosudarstvennku for private funding of museums and generally against government interference in the affairs of art :) |
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 09:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.