Three gouaches
 

I ask professionals and amateurs, and Genosse publikum, etc. comment on the artistic and commercial value of these works, as well as plastic and color and the consistency of the author.

Dimensions:

36H48
36H48
45H60

The works were made 10 years ago, more precisely a third in 1999, the first and second - in the 2000th.

I would add that the pictures taken on high quality paper and the best in the world gouache paints, ie in the original nice matte velvety surface.

I like the picture. All competently ...

To say anything more difficult. Not enough information about the artist (if available). Is missing information in general ...

What is this?

Good design. But from the standpoint of painting for me boring.

No, not design, but refers to stained glass.
There is a paradox in the works-tuned and, simultaneously, ambiguity, which makes them all the same art.
I like ... They are due to its geometrical should give the impression of coldness, a computer that, if, while they were alive.

In my opinion, this modern art

 But the thesis - to judge art work, you need to have information about the artist, strongly disagree. Let's enjoy the music, not overlooking the fact that its author Salieri (whose guilt, moreover, is not proven).
I think everyone has the example of the artist a better person and vice versa. Let's separate these concepts when evaluating works of art.


Vladimir
Can you feel boring Mondrian, Aurelia Nemours and Peter Halle? I do not! You have shown yourself here fast trainee. Look closely, guashki not boring, and very even Major-gay, it is suitable for decoration of your homes.

Flatter, my friend! But still good. I was always confident that my great talent - high trainability. I have even higher mathematics at the institute only at the "ex." handed them anything in it without realizing.
   
To decorate my house will not fit - the format is too small. But for the registration of flats - why not? I wrote - a good [interior] design. However, show me, please, these gouaches in the original. Then, perhaps, I'll apologize and eat them before the public.

You know, the author has, and large formats, but they are much more expensive.

In general, it is ready to fulfill orders. For example, could in the same vein, do a portrait of your plant, factory or farm. Incidentally, these gouaches have names. The biggest is called "The pavilion in the woods", two others - "Pavilion in the Park" and "Pavilion on the water."

And about the design, I note that he lived in Paris, a remarkable Russian artist Harry Fife, it is no less remarkable writer Michael Herman called his work a monumental design. What I mean is that the Russian vocabulary has not kept pace hereby contemporary art.

If such pictures were painted 100 years ago, one could say that when it was new, original. Now these songs are doing on the first course in the first half as the familiarization with the principles of formal composition. Why is now drawing is not clear. Is that if someone you need to fill a blank wall work in a certain style.

Yes, I do not even know the prices of these small works. How would they have not shocked!
He writes that the author is ready to perform, but I'm not ready to place an order. I just phrases: "Ready to buy - do not scatter. Yes, and I have no plant or factory to portray.

If you judge a commercial component, then somewhere around 2-3 thousand rubles. Can be more expensive if sold in an expensive frame and an expensive gallery. But where to find a buyer with a lot of money, and a small apartment?

Added after 1 minute
I have the same thing to say. If it was drawn a little earlier "Black Square, Malevich - honor and praise to the artist! And so have no way of gouache not help improve the experience. I'm bored ... Better go and look at Vermeer reproductions. Or I'll go to sleep.

Good night!

Uh-uh ... This is about what he would do? If the author of these works have just embarked on the path of art - it is probably worthwhile to support him morally. And if long?

Вложение 781321