Krachkovskii, watercolor
 

Hello I ask for your evaluation of authenticity (if it is possible for the photo) and the estimated cost of this work.
Yours.

Добавлено через 8 минут
...................

...
 

...................

I do not know how much it Krachkovskii, but, in my opinion, water is very pretty, lively, forgery does not smell, those times, most likely he is, left to look at the acc. sites, how much water Krachkovskago acc. razmerof.

This did not work Krachkovsky (unless of course we are talking about Joseph Evstafevich). He was not a great artist, but all the same has been an academician. That is, he was the school. The school is the ability to draw. Figure - ABC is academic. While the student has not mastered the figure, it is not allowed to subsequent stages.

 This work is very sloppy. That the school itself is just not there. The manner and the signature is not similar.


Watercolor Krachkovsky:

You see, what was happening.
They provided some good watercolors.

He had a blunt izobrazhalovo, I said from the bulldozer, but he had not only the ridiculous image that you presented.

Of course, it does not Krachkovskii, but ... better.
True, not much.


_____________________

A cool I am, as always, soaked situation, coming like a fool in the arena?
Noticed?

What motivates the newly registered, predstvlyaya on this site to "assess the authenticity and approximate value" samples of painting?
Perhaps hoping that there are professional critics, who donated will spend precious time on a reasoned assessment of the merits or shortcomings, of belonging to the artistic heritage of ....?
Ah, naive !!!!!!
Will the image in memory Ineta with amateur "soprovodilovom" Give God so as not delusional - that the whole result.
Regarding the assessment. Is it so difficult to form an opinion yourself reviewing the information in an Internet and interviewing a couple of "art-dealers, commissioners, and similar" trading "as the ROAR -" ask the price. "Add it all up with their demands, there is time to sell (if you have such intention) and to share in the common sense to get the price?

Better or worse, is another question. We are interested in Krachkovskii it or not.

Added after 4 minutes
They can and absurd, but true.

No published watercolors Krachkovsky very little. They are almost there ...

Added after 7 minutes

In my opinion, this work Krachkovsky much more.

Added after 19 minutes

That softened, it is a fact. But what about the "fool", you are too hasty. You have shared their impressions, but the impression has been an integral part of the process of cognition. The impression is also amenable to analysis ... You just think how much falshakov bought impressed! " And do not count! ... ;)

That's all, yes, but ... I am not an expert in this field and, as it were, heavily, all the above manipulations, done independently, without knowing about art and its market equivalent.
Work came to me quite casually and without, and therefore interested in the above ...

Vyacheslav! Thank you. After some communication with sdeshnimi experts came to a similar conclusion.

klient71, and you do not like the answers of participants to your questions?