Investing in junk art
 

I touched on this a little here and there. That's decided to start a separate topic, suddenly someone is interested too.

On the stock market there is a concept-junk bonds, junk stocks-trash promissory notes and shares, which traded e t a penny, or rather cents. There are specialists who are engaged only in buying such shares. Investing in them do not require big money, but the growth is sometimes overwhelming.

I recently passed information about the auction of works of the tobacco factories, ordered by various artists in compliance with the conditions of Nesco, inexpensive, large format, bright large. Time has passed and now the collection is being sold for very good money, although there is no Warhol or Pollock.

Considering catalogs Gelos-Sovkoma I see that this kind of work, such as the 1970's, large format, large-bright-no, and if they meet, they are expensive. Most trade is medium and small format.

What do you think about this method of investing? te order from artists mean fame, rank and file, about 100 works cheap format 100x120, brightest and put them on 10 years in the corner. Ten years to get and sell.

Posted 18 minutes
There are statistics for top artists. Are there any statistics on the artists without a name?
For example, the UK is working in good condition, a little-known artist 100x100 in 1900? 1950? 1970? 1990?
T e is there growth?

If you're 30 years old can take such a risky experiment.
And I was 50 and I have such liberties are not going to pamper myself. Why? What will happen in 10 years?
-You see, a two-century nameryal. (c) :D

Cyril Syzranskiy, if Mr. Weber, a decade ago instead of Picasso for 30 million bought in the same amount in Moscow Khrushchev - he had not had to think, but whether it will rise twice? and would have risen and income has ... Never too late to think about money ...

Who against?
Think ...
:D

Added after 25 minutes
Seriy, about "bought the same amount in Moscow Khrushchev did not understand.

Cyril Syzranskiy, I am that if he had not put a Picasso, but in a thread inconspicuous worthless asset, it is quite possible, financially it would be successful.

Very original logic .:D ->

In "Moscow Khrushchev?
Then too in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro or in the Soweto township shacks ...
:D
This is for you, by the way:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...&postcount=174

Cyril Syzranskiy, I am a member of RAO-Russian Authors' Society, Weber was doing, I have the idea.
Better if you spoke on the theme topic.

But whether they fully you have an idea of him as a collector of paintings?

I have already spoken.
I repeat: I have to experiment with unknown artists, whose works are may in 10 years to rise, I will not, and such thoughts are now to order a large, bright and wait 10 years (what? For something?) I have never arose.
It's like a fish to the bait: sitting, looking at the float and wait, hoping that there under the water some fish bite the bait and swallow the hook.
How to rest this might be interesting, but when the fish to feed the family and the cat, and even more of the catch and have to sell, more appropriate network of fishing professionally in commercial quantities.
A? No? On the float will look?
:D

Fishing poles will be cast in 10 years, and while Let us something other thread. T e a float is not necessary.