Bovie V
 

Not found and this artist. Look, please. Best regards.

There was a Belgian artist Virginia Bovee (full name Joséphine Louise Virginie Bovie, 1824-1888). Of those Bovie, which is in the network, it is the only approach. However, sample her signature I could not be found. Embedding is taken from a link http://books.google.ru/books?id=fIPj...22 & f = false.
More about her can be found in
http://www.artfact.ulg.ac.be/revue/b...kum/index.html.

Please: let us, please sign bigger.

Thank you for the information. What do you think the external data pattern is consistent with this period? Also, I understand, if so, determine the value of hard work. Sorry for the picture captions. Laziness has destroyed. Has exposed the photos that came with the picture. I promise to reform. Sincerely, Maiga.

I found only Joséphine Louise BOVIE (1826-1877) and some Virginie BOVIE (XIX-XX).
But the pictures of either of the other saw.

And that she is. In the dates - confusion. Embedding is taken from a book about famous women in Belgium, there is 1821 - 1888, probably the most accurate data. Known something known, but neither her paintings, no signature, I, too, the network is not found. In general, the question of authorship can not be considered until the end of resolved. Moreover,
Good question. Anything can happen. Preservation you perfect. What's the basis? You did not. If a good rag board, it is literate, technology paints and good storage conditions cracelures may not be. I have a painting in 1832 at a cardboard - cracelures no.

Thank you, Kirill! Understood. But something does not give me rest. These terrible hands, her angularity ... I think that is a modern work. How do you think? Maiga.

BAGIRA, especially not considered.
Now look, do not like, some sort of semi-amateur work.
The author seems more interested in the fan and the style dress portrayed.

Thank Amateur! 'll Have to pull out of the frame, to take pictures of cut-spotted. Rama impression of concrete, heavy. Yes, and forgot to set the size of the picture: 30h40sm.

Frame is good. Dearer than most pictures, I think. :)

Okay. The picture is not impressive.