Thanks all

This is not a professional painting, and some folk art self-taught artist, but does not Arkhipova. Because there is nothing to evaluate, it is not Arkhipov.

Vadim, and I read, "1936." No?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
And why "A." must-Abram?

Cyril Syzransky,
So I read in 1936. Arkhipov had died in the 1930th. But the owner knows best as the year to read. This is a mockery of Arkhipov, a kind of caricature image.
And I think this fake before walking with the caption "Sychkov. But I can be wrong.

SergeiSK, A where you saw it interesting before? This picture I had brought from Germany.

German eBay http://www.ebay.de/

SergeiSK, I do not know at the expense of Ebay, she stood in the antique. shop in Frankfurt

Vadim,
I have it somewhere on the internet auction site saw, for sure. I also like that it is not Arkhipov.
Find and compare his paintings, everything will become clear.

SergeiSK, sorry, you art critic? You know that Abramova characteristic broad strokes? And the genre is also characteristic of his work. This picture falls under its so-called series of village girls from Ryazan, where he led the heroes of his pictures from the stuffy room into the fresh air "

I hear it constantly from everyone who does not like the view of his paintings. I am a collector. The fact that Arkhipova broad strokes, and that he led the Ryazan girls on the street is not podtverdaet its authorship. Well, pictures of the same genre can be found at the same Sychkova, Makovsky, etc. Do not you Arkhipov, and amateur artists.
Let others will express their opinion ....